The Negatives of Animal Testing - 1027 Words

Many people may not realize that the majority of products in their own home have been tested on animals; from lipstick and shampoo to dish soap and foot powder. Even the white ink on an MM has been tested on animals. To some, this statement may be alarming and even disturbing – to others it may not mean much at all. Either way, the debate over animal testing has gained much popularity in recent decades. Animal testing has been done since at least 500 BC; even Aristotle experimented on animals for scientific reasoning. Around 200 AD, dissecting animals in public was actually used as a form of entertainment, people would actually go and watch someone perform a vivisection on an animal. Vivisection is when an organism is dissected while it†¦show more content†¦It is cruel and inhumane to put animals through so much agony, they can feel pain and suffering too, just like humans; they just cannot speak to stand up for themselves. Recently, a monkey was photographed saving a puppy from a tsunami in Japan. The image just proved how much the monkey cared and knew what was happening, and knew that he/she had to save the puppy and get away. Animals are smarter than most people think - they feel love, fear, and pain. Many religious traditions say that people should care for animals, treat them with respect, and try not to cause them harm or suffering (Ferdowsian). Animal testing is also unreliable. Even though animal testing is responsible for many medical breakthroughs, some of those breakthroughs could have been made without testing them on animals. The drugs that pass animal testing and get put on the market are not always safe (Scott). There was a drug called Vioxx that was proven to help mice and protect their heart, but when humans started using the drug, it caused thousands of heart attacks, many resulting in death. According to Dr. Furlong, â€Å"94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials†. That is an astonishingly high number. If the results are so inaccurate, then what is the purpose of even testing on the animals? (Ferdowsian) It can also be the other way around, some drugs/chemicals may workShow MoreRelatedThe Negative Effects Of Animal Testing941 Words   |  4 PagesAnimal testing has been around since 500 BC starting with dissecting animals in ancient greece. French animal testers believed that animals were â€Å"automata† and could not feel pain or emotions. There was no public objections to animal testing until the 19th century when there was an increase of adopting domestic pets. Nowadays public opinion is split down the middle on whether or not animals should be tested on. The animals are generally tested on for cosmetics, health, commercial, biomedical, spaceRead MoreThe Negative Effects Of Animal Testing1966 Words   |  8 PagesAnimal Testing, Why it Should be Eliminated   Ã‚  Ã‚   Animals have been used for scientific testing since the ages of Aristotle and Erasistratus.   Should we continue using animals as our test subjects, or is it time for a change? Many argue over whether testing on animals is good or bad, this debate has been continuous because it has both positive and negative affects. Animal testing has been the cause of many scientific breakthroughs, but, these are overthrown by the negative impact that animal testingRead MoreThe Negative Effect Of Animal Testing1989 Words   |  8 Pages DTRP Written Report by Shi Jin Foundation studies 2015 Design Technology Research Project Animal testing The negative effect of animal testing Student: S3365788 Shi Jin (Anna) Group members: Najwa Elyna Binti Rosman s3499394 Teacher : Timothy Krysko Contents Part A. Research Report 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Analysis of findings 3.1 Research question 3.2 Results Read MoreEssay about Negative Aspects of Animal Testing1257 Words   |  6 PagesAn Evil Science: ANIMALS IN RESEARCH Dating back to ancient times, animals have been used in research to advance biomedical sciences. However, the ways the human race can exploit these living creatures are absolutely evil. The main concern animal rights advocates have are not concerned with the idea of using animals in research but the way people can torture these animals. The twentieth century has witnessed some of the cruelest acts of violence in the laboratory but it has also seen the riseRead MoreWhen Discussing Ethics, We Consider The Negative And Positive1360 Words   |  6 PagesWhen discussing ethics, we consider the negative and positive effects certain moral lifestyles may have on human individuals, human societies, and on humanity as a whole. We debate whether or not we should act in the interest of our personal good, or on the good of others who may or may not be affected at all. Ethicists seek to identify the path which grants humanity a way to use our free will of choice so that, as a result, we suffer the least amount of consequences, or no consequences at allRead MoreAnimal Testing : Inhumane And Unmoral1351 Words   |  6 Pages Thousands of animals lose their lives for next to no reason while subject to test in laboratories that give us these products. Animal testing is inhumane and unmoral. It needs to be stopped and the public needs to be educated about what is animal testing and the negative effect it has on animals, educated on animal testing alternatives, and educated on which organizations to support in the world to get rid of animal testing. Animals are test subjects of numerous products. Animal test subjects areRead MoreThe Cruelty That Is Endured During Animal Testing1704 Words   |  7 Pagescruelty that is endured during animal testing The testing of animals in the cosmetic industry is purely inhumane, due to the fact that the benefit of testing does not prove to be as useful to offset the negative impact it has on animals, or offset the value of alternatives testing. â€Å"The thinking, feeling animals who are used in experiments are treated like nothing more than disposable laboratory equipment.† The scientist testing on animals should not treat animals like they are not living, consciousRead MoreThe Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing1725 Words   |  7 PagesEach year, more than 100 million animals are experimented on in U.S. laboratories. These experiments are for things such as biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing.(Procon writers) Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. An imal testing is controversial and people findRead MoreAnimal Testing Should Stop Testing Their Products On Animals1722 Words   |  7 Pageshistory, animal experimentation has played a significant important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. However, what many people tend to forget are the numbers of animal subjects that have suffered serious harm during the process of experimentation. Each day across America innocent animals are used as test subjects for products that have little to no relevance importance. Animal testing has had many negative issues arise in society in a negative way. Debating over the animal rightsRead MoreStop Using Products That Have Been Tested On Animals And Show Them The Other Choices That They Have Out Essay795 Words   |  4 Pageshave been tested on animals and show them the other choices that they have out there. Introduction: Attention Step: According to PETA, â€Å"Animals are also used in toxicity tests conducted as part of massive regulatory testing programs that are often funded by U.S. taxpayers’ money. The Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Toxicology Program, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture are just a few of the government agencies that subject animals to crude, painful